Avell G1513 BS MUV / A52 BS MUV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAvell G1513 BS MUV / A52 BS MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell Avell G1513 BS MUV / A52 BS MUV
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 20:49
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 691
73% 582 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Device(1D05 1068) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 39
Parallax 42
29% 38.8 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 38.6
Splatting 25.7
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28512GPTCB3B-S114613 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 99 95 96 123 279 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.8% Above average
Read 195
Write 105
Mixed 135
SusWrite 167
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 31.1
86% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 128
91% 117 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 81%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
112GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 43 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 151
Write 72.8
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 36.4
96% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
96% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.C16FD1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1513 BS MUV / A52 BS MUV Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Avell G1513 BS MUV / A52 BS MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback