Asus GL702VT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus GL702VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VT
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160930
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 19:28
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 168
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 510
47% 392 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1310) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 43.1
Parallax 38.9
32% 40.3 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35
31% 38.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1002 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 33 35 32 31 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 67%
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
105GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 130 95 95 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 393
Write 113
Mixed 332
SusWrite 133
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 29.3
107% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 209
186% 279 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 91%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
253GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 111 112 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 93.1
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 111
59% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 23.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VT Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback