Megaport 83-FRa-174624

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMegaport 83-FRa-174624  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-K II
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 279
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 872
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 109
Parallax 111
92% 111 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 91.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 50 37 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 426
Write 185
Mixed 109
SusWrite 39.4
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 33.7
69% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 73.4
73% 116 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
618GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 147 142 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 161
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 154
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA266.M8FB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 83-FRa-174624 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: Megaport 83-FRa-174624

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback