In-sing K14J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemIn-sing K14J  (all builds)
MotherboardIn-Sing K14J
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime38 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 13:19
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 26%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 554
62% 489 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.3 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1535 1535 993 588 536 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,565
Write 1,539
Mixed 1,218
SusWrite 1,117
306% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 83.9
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 860
DQ Mixed 342
388% 656 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 256%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung H9CCNNNCLTMLAR-NUD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.7% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 3 60 13.9" 1280 657 BOE06E2
Typical K14J Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: In-sing K14J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback