Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte A320M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '17 at 18:39
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 182 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 503 52% 417 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 1975 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 38.8 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 35.7 32% 34.7 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 36.3 21% 24.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 336GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 175 1716 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 66 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 123 (C2) HDA temperature 110 105 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	107% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 180 Mixed 170 136% 181 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.82 4K Mixed 0.27 110% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FBD 1x8GB 907 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.6 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.2 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	33x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	25x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	13x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	12x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 8,300 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16