Asus P5K/EPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K/EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080418
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 94.9
45% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 95
8-Core 97.3
13% 96.2 Pts
64-Core 94.6
6% 94.6 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
AMD(1002 010A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 85 95 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 156
Write 96.9
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 92.9
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 17.3
73% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 70.4
DQ Mixed 23.4
25% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 89%
Kingston DataTraveler 120 16GB
11GB free, PID 1623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 7.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 11.6
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 22" 1280 720 ACRAD92 Acer AL2216W
Typical P5K/EPU Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback