Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3632QM 24,912 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 157 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 399 43% 340 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0647) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2.8 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.8 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 163 162 161 159 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 472 Write 169 Mixed 205 SusWrite 172 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 28.9 101% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 199 168% 251 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 128%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 168GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 87 89 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 76.6 Write 81.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 87.9 54% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 6GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	40.7% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 79.1 50% 79.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	683x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	84x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	73x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	63x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 544 samples	37x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	28x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80