Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181204
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 03 '22 at 22:58
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 64.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 173 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 706 77% 609 Pts	64-Core 745 46% 745 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3752) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 107 Parallax 110 95% 111 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 102 Splatting 91.3 87% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 306 307 301 291 299 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 372 Write 243 Mixed 275 SusWrite 301 67% 297 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 34.5 126% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 236 202% 299 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 129%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 224GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 54 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 77.6 Write 78.9 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 53.2 48% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 20.2 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,894x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,734x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,094x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	486x
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	459x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	385x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $55Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	308x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	230x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	209x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	196x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	159x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $891

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369