Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z590M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 22:52
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900F-$240
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 52.7
1-Core 166
2-Core 309
90% 176 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 452
71% 509 Pts
64-Core 698
43% 698 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 74%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 76.7
Parallax 75.4
65% 77.3 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 59.2
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 716 259 253 565 1093 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 782
Write 505
Mixed 591
SusWrite 502
133% 595 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1.5
30% 8.87 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 282
206% 270 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 429%
Samsung 860 PRO 512GB
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 496 498 498 502 503 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 4133 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z590M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z590M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $631
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback