TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

CMS 7200-0209A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCMS 7200-0209A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A68HM-PLUS
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 120
52% 85.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 185
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 50%
 Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 13.1
0% 7.3 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 7.5
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 2.32%
 Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 30 33 23 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 108
Write 124
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 29.2
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 39.6%
 Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 35%
 Great: 61%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 7200-0209A Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-0209A

CPU
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD  $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples4x
A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD  $889Bench 47%, 6,638 samples2x
GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples2x
HD 5850AMDBench 15%, 15,020 samples1x
R9 290XAMD  $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples1x
SSD
SU650 240GBAdata  $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples1x
SD8TB8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 73%, 4,613 samples1x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples1x
RAM
CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,109 samples4x
DCLT8GN128S Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GBUnknownBench 46%, 2 samples1x
CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 53%, 4,052 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback