Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 20:39
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 870
92% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 21
Parallax 29.5
18% 24.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 21.7
16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 512GB
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1455 570 560 570 556 561 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 2,005
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 712
322% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 55
180% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 873
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 806
608% 814 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 196%
Great: 267%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45
429GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 118 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 119
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
381GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 139 135 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 154
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 138
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 28.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback