HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory0.4 GB free of 2.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080409
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 16:42
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4450B-$21
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 38
1-Core 22
2-Core 40.8
22% 33.6 Pts
4-Core 61
8-Core 56.7
8% 58.8 Pts
64-Core 61.4
4% 61.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)
HP(103C 3029) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9SA02 250GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2AC60W
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 32 46 36 29 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 4.3
Write 11
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 34.5
10% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 35GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback