Asus ZenBook Q526FA_Q526FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q526FA_Q526FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q526FA
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 511
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1ECE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 8.2
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 19 35 26 15 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 376
Write 259
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 39.8
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 13.2
30% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 43.7
DQ Write 60
DQ Mixed 112
68% 72 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 125 120 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 115
Write 116
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 125
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q526FA_Q526FA Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q526FA_Q526FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback