PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C37 |
Motherboard | MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) (all builds) |
Memory | 1.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200907 |
Uptime | 8.7 Days |
Run Date | Feb 03 '22 at 16:22 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 330 337 303 265 241 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
37%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 2,238x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 1,557x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,119x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 871x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 754x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 751x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $1,053 |