Foxconn H55M-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn H55M-S  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 14 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 14:15
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 148
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 378
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 132
Parallax 123
98% 125 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 126
Splatting 114
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$51
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 144 161 157 154 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 239
Write 160
Mixed 162
SusWrite 150
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 28.7
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 27.9
30% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
142GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 171 226 230 228 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.6% Good
Read 238
Write 229
Mixed 230
SusWrite 208
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 38
124% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 51.1
41% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 125%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567, Sandisk
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31
Write 10.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 10.8
20% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
115% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 13
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-S Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H55M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback