Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E558

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E558  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2B7
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200908
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 08:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 121
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 487
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Fujitsu(10CF 1959) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.5
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV1T0TBN5 1TB
505GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 434 383 330 333 296 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 360
Write 314
Mixed 342
SusWrite 363
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 39.7
135% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 337
253% 338 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E558 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E558

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback