GEO GeoBook 120

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGEO GeoBook 120  (all builds)
MotherboardGEO EM_IA218_200B_ENE_TI_V1.0
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210309
Uptime41.2 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 02:49
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 26.1
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 78.3
26% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 140
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.3
2% 2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung uSD Card Reader 128GB
119GB free, PID 61fd
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 84 87 93 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 149
Write 109
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 92
144% 112 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.4
241% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 279
14% 279 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GeoBook 120 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: GEO GeoBook 120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback