Microelectronics G157

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicroelectronics G157  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H310M-HDV/M.2
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 02:11
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 648
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.32
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 105
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 90.5
85% 92.9 fps
MRender 81.3
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 65.4
59% 73.2 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0B-00YS70 250GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 264
Mixed 236
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 16
113% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 214
161% 223 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$99
279GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 429 441 449 415 416 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 464
Mixed 437
SusWrite 431
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 52.8
173% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 326
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 23.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G157 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Microelectronics G157

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback