Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 65 1-Core 58.7 2-Core 108 47% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 149 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9071) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.19% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 2.07 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.19% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 161 157 158 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 210 Write 161 Mixed 152 SusWrite 158 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 13.5 45% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 12.8 DQ Write 20.8 DQ Mixed 14.2 12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	25% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.5 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	14x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	16x

SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $65Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
320 Series 160GBIntel $149Bench 42%, 13,029 samples	1x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $167