| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150323 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '22 at 23:05 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.9%
Good
|
60% 96.9 Pts
|
41% 335 Pts
|
26% 415 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
|
37.2%
Below average
|
35% 47.1 fps
|
41% 51.7 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
49.7%
Average
|
51% 18 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 899 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 442x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
| FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $626 |