Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 16:13
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 112
58% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 273
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 0.9
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU900 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1018HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 191 155 189 21 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.4% Above average
Read 240
Write 218
Mixed 218
SusWrite 164
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 136
105% 143 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 97 109 11 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 95.2
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 1TB
329GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 73 60 64 12 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 81
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 61.1
90% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 1TB
366GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 59 67 8.9 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 79.6
Write 81.7
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 59.4
90% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 45%
ST932032 5AS 320GB
280GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 56 47 52 7.6 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 56.4
Write 47.8
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 47.8
62% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback