Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	Memory 33.8 1-Core 42.3 2-Core 25.8 24% 34 Pts	4-Core 61.8 8-Core 73.9 9% 67.8 Pts	64-Core 74.3 5% 74.3 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 1.6 2% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0707A SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 109 100 109 122 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 292 Write 131 Mixed 126 SusWrite 117 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 6.5 45% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 55.4 58% 96 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	2x

SSD
128G 128GBSSDBench 57%, 241 samples	2x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x2GBABCDBench 19%, 5,404 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16