Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.60GHz 38 User benchmarks, average bench 33% PROC_1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 51.1 1-Core 26.3 2-Core 48.5 28% 42 Pts	4-Core 65.5 8-Core 62.4 9% 64 Pts	64-Core 62.2 4% 62.2 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 77 58 74 70 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 111 Write 104 Mixed 102 SusWrite 74.2 22% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 13.2 45% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 16.4 11% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 577GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 91 95 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 105 Write 109 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 89.2 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x1GB 2,345 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 6 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16