Skikk Idavoll

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSkikk Idavoll  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU Idavoll
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 12:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66% Good
Memory 69.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 433
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8686) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.37 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6
Splatting 1
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1193 1054 1414 1167 1277 765 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,053
Write 1,211
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 1,145
251% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 75.8
260% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 673
502% 673 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 223%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C22 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Idavoll Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Skikk Idavoll

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback