Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 12:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 358
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 38.9
Parallax 37.9
29% 37.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 26.2
27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 73 1.8 2.2 98 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 236
Write 203
Mixed 192
SusWrite 59
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 12.7
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 25.4
35% 66 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
131GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 117 119 119 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 132
Write 121
Mixed 64
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1600C11 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback