Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '17 at 06:28
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 612
82% 612 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (73 fps cap detected)
59% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 63.5
59% 69.8 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 72.4
58% 71.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190
809GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 517
Write 354
Mixed 342
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 9.62
99% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 43.1
95% 199 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 103%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 486
Write 341
Mixed 338
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 22.9
118% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 37.9
80% 163 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D4-2400-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.7
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.6
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270MX-Gaming5 Builds (Compare 247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270MX-Gaming5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $668
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback