Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 56 1-Core 19.2 2-Core 38.3 27% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 38.5 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 38.7 2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 908D) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.911.0.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 87 78 73 91 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 89.9 Write 89 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 81 57% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	3x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HD0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 19%, 293 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBElpidaBench 35%, 195 samples	1x