Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Gaming K6  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 730
69% 573 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 76.9
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 79.1
63% 83.1 fps
MRender 84.6
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 82.4
67% 81.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 927 842 841 846 848 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,151
Write 1,964
Mixed 1,579
SusWrite 1,040
377% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 70.2
229% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 815
DQ Write 509
DQ Mixed 670
497% 665 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 251%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$104
670GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 1926 1520 1416 1432 1440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,068
Write 1,896
Mixed 1600
SusWrite 1,614
403% 1,794 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 68.9
231% 80.5 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 722
531% 706 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 284%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
624GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 112 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 97.8
Write 103
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 113
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 109%
Generic- Multiple Reader 256GB
70GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 24
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 27.2
39% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.2
209% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback