HP 23-h109

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 23-h109  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B09
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700T APU (2013 D.Ri)-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 107
46% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 165
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650D
HP(103C 2B09) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.2
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 168 156 161 176 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.9% Good
Read 281
Write 183
Mixed 188
SusWrite 161
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 26.8
101% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 121
117% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-h109 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-h109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback