Lenovo 90N9008VGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90N9008VGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 370A
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210308
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 14:31
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 773
73% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.55
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 107
Parallax 112
94% 112 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 101
Splatting 91.5
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L1 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 135 144 147 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 766
Write 158
Mixed 203
SusWrite 145
69% 318 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 44.1
156% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 473
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 220
182% 273 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5200ME78HAF-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 25
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90N9008VGE Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 90N9008VGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback