Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H170M-E D3 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '22 at 11:21
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$78 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 172 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 374 50% 372 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 3413) CLim: 913 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.2% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 44.9 Parallax 61.1 33% 49 fps	MRender 48.9 Gravity 43.5 Splatting 32 33% 41.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 105 138 93 99 90 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 417 Write 394 Mixed 315 SusWrite 122 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 39.5 130% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 158 134% 198 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 162GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 84 87 83 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Read 33.2 Write 64.7 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 84.7 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 17.6 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $78Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	64x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	57x
Core i5-6600Intel $135Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	57x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 5,347 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $106

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16