Asus VM60

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VM60  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK VM60
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 116
54% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 166
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.53 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 259 263 256 252 234 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 435
Write 434
Mixed 354
SusWrite 270
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 35.7
118% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 331
248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 124%
CHIPSBNK v3.3.9.6 2GB
1GB free, PID 2093
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.3 6.3 6.3 6 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 4.7
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 6.2
9% 8.18 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VM60 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VM60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback