Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 20:02
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User REU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 162
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 281
38% 285 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 108F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1123
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 16
13% 16.2 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 12.8
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 649 616 744 719 798 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1270
Write 922
Mixed 965
SusWrite 672
214% 957 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 43.6
158% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 116
173% 350 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 161%
Great: 372%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
178GB free
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 80 53 40 77 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 41.3
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 62.3
30% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 62%
ST1000LM035-1RK1 1TB
422GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 81 104 65 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 54.7
Write 37
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 82.6
79% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 20
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback