Asus TP203NAH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TP203NAH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP203NAH
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 17:43
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
29.2% Poor
Memory 45.3
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 76.6
33% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 82.2
10% 79.5 Pts
64-Core 79.5
5% 79.5 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 1930) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02K0S86D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 277 299 308 313 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 378
Write 325
Mixed 326
SusWrite 301
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 32.8
115% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 118
90% 122 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TP203NAH Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TP203NAH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback