HP Laptop 15s-du0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-du0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85F0
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 94.6
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 111
63% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 344
32% 267 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
HP(103C 85F0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9733
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 12.3
Parallax 12.7
11% 12.7 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 9.3
9% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B872202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 147 139 148 140 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 529
Mixed 597
SusWrite 146
139% 631 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 65.9
229% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 328
293% 442 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 152%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.2% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 19.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-du0xxx Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-du0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback