Positivo N1240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPositivo N1240  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo N14DP6
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
24.3% Poor
Memory 32.4
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 111
36% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 93.4
8-Core 95.9
13% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 94.4
6% 94.4 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(1C6C 070B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.6
2% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 43 51 39 41 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 93.7
Write 94.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 43.7
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 63%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
6GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 30.6
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 36.7
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N1240 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo N1240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback