PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190605 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 29 '22 at 23:10 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
99.4%
Outstanding
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290X-$549
Gigabyte(1458 2281) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 207 212 215 215 217 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
825GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 193 191 192 191 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
33GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 110 92 78 93 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 4 4.7 5.7 6 5.5 MB/s
|
7.85%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
697GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 39 39 39 39 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160T 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 475x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 348x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 266x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 166x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 161x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 150x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $523 |