Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 167
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 489
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.4
3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 132 127 125 132 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 324
Write 137
Mixed 161
SusWrite 142
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 16.7
70% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 38.9
DQ Mixed 34.9
27% 37 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
553GB free
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 99 100 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 82.9
Write 92.6
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 98.3
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback