HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 16:36
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 49.3
29% 43.2 Pts
4-Core 85.2
8-Core 93.5
12% 89.3 Pts
64-Core 82.2
5% 82.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJF180A5 SATA 180GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LWDi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 173 158 174 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48% Average
Read 322
Write 186
Mixed 215
SusWrite 170
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 15.1
60% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 132
102% 142 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback