TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7883
MotherboardMSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)  (all builds)
Memory121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 06:20
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$504
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 724
67% 560 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 78.4%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Asus(1043 87B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
200% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 354
Parallax 299
238% 315 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 246
Splatting 180
198% 252 fps
Poor: 163% ↑
This bench: 200%
 Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
921GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 699 928 938 935 946 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1822
Write 2,108
Mixed 1,895
SusWrite 793
372% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 68.6
220% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 675
496% 656 MB/s
Poor: 173% ↑
This bench: 219%
 Great: 502%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
952GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 488 488 487 486 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 484
Mixed 421
SusWrite 487
107% 477 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 50
170% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 119%
 Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3400 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 40.2
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 22.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 124%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING CARBON (MS-7883)

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel  $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples60x
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples37x
Core i7-5960XIntel  $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples36x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples50x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples39x
GTX 980-TiNvidia  $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples12x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples17x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples10x
RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples10x
F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ F4-3000C14-16GTZ F4-3000C15-8GTZ 96GBUnknownBench 120%, 7 samples7x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback