HP 870-210se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 870-210se  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 04:18
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 209
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 620
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 203
Parallax 195
188% 210 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 155
Splatting 126
135% 171 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 156%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 1394 1662 1374 1396 1409 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 2,075
Mixed 1,596
SusWrite 1382
411% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 80.2
268% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,197
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,039
783% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 306%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 192 190 196 197 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 161
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 190
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 169 170 169 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 146
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 168
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-210se Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: HP 870-210se

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback