TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Zotac MEK Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemZotac MEK Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC MEK Mini
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 22:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 778
84% 665 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 96.4%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 4509)
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 150
Parallax 142
126% 149 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 130
Splatting 116
112% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 237 194 191 193 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 885
Write 550
Mixed 362
SusWrite 210
111% 502 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 55.3
182% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 367
344% 538 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 133%
 Great: 214%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 502 557 508 521 359 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,248
Write 1,027
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 537
214% 957 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 65.4
216% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 432
442% 728 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 189%
 Great: 311%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 125 129 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 68
SusWrite 129
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 67.9%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 74.2%
 Great: 81%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MEK Mini Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Zotac MEK Mini

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples6x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples5x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples4x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples5x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples4x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia  $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples4x
SSD
SSD 256GBPcieBench 152%, 15,792 samples4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples2x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples2x
RAM
CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GBUnknownBench 77%, 18 samples3x
ON48G26S819-ZHA 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 24 samples3x
251-10301-3700F 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 13 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback