TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Veriton M4665G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton M4665G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M4665G
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,130
100% 851 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 99.4%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
HP(103C 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 80.5
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 83.9
66% 84.9 fps
MRender 87.7
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 94.5
74% 89.2 fps
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 68.3%
 Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 488 477 523 478 510 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,159
Write 1,337
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 535
238% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 71.9
253% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,079
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1,058
808% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑
This bench: 206%
 Great: 213%
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 11 79 218 57 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 421
Write 348
Mixed 251
SusWrite 101
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 7.9
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 29.1
38% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 36.4%
 Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 50.4%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Veriton M4665G Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M4665G

CPU
Core i5-9400Intel  $160Bench 86%, 22,187 samples10x
Core i7-9700Intel  $243Bench 92%, 79,875 samples9x
Core i3-9100Intel  $122Bench 80%, 7,621 samples6x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples9x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples6x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples4x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples7x
TS512GE80-ACE 512GBTranscendBench 189%, 14 samples3x
NFS011SA356-6007000 256GBBench 60%, 28 samples2x
RAM
ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 48%, 309 samples6x
BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 859B CT8G4DFS6266.M4FE 32GBUnknownBench 71%, 3 samples3x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 3,004 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback