Today's hottest deals

PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 11:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$204
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 68
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 241
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 702
73% 587 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 185
Parallax 178
138% 178 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 178
Splatting 123
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 116 189 143 96 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 476
Write 419
Mixed 326
SusWrite 171
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 26.1
112% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 166
133% 193 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.9% Very good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 23.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: PC X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback