Biostar TPower I55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TPower I55  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100105
Uptime13 Days
Run DateJan 28 '22 at 03:05
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 140
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 261
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
830GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 225 226 229 229 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.9% Good
Read 251
Write 236
Mixed 230
SusWrite 225
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 35.8
112% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 196
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
270GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 68 67 69 70 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 68
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 65.7
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TPower I55 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar TPower I55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback