Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 21 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Memory 27.6 1-Core 5.2 2-Core 10.6 12% 14.5 Pts	4-Core 9.8 8-Core 10.4 1% 10.1 Pts	64-Core 10.8 1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 167 73 164 163 165 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.6% Below average	Read 188 Write 179 Mixed 179 SusWrite 149 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 13.8 46% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 35.1 DQ Mixed 36.3 28% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 101%
ADATA XPG EX500 500GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 320GB free, PID a73a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 12 21 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 11.6 Write 11.4 Mixed 8.7 SusWrite 19.9 18% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.5% Terrible	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.8 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.5% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16