PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MLV3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130725 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 27 '22 at 18:16 |
Run Duration | 323 Seconds |
Run User | DZA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata Premier SP610 128GB-$49
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 106 100 98 91 91 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS725025A9A364 250GB-$79
32GB free
Firmware: PC2OCH0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 61 61 62 62 62 MB/s
|
36.9%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
310GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 174 164 174 169 173 MB/s
|
80%
Excellent
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
5GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 MB/s
|
0.54%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Pentium G2030Intel $24Bench 49%, 18,277 samples | 33x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 28x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 27x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 62x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 21x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $53 |