Monster TULPAR T7 V21.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V21.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V21.2
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 277
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 926
89% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,381
86% 1,381 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 108B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 114
Parallax 8.5
5% 42.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.3
4% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.52%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 108B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 114
Parallax 116
91% 114 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 110
Splatting 101
96% 120 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1412 1342 1370 1391 1265 1066 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,480
Write 1,684
Mixed 516
SusWrite 1,307
332% 1,497 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 85.5
279% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,258
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 1,047
788% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 28.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 30.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V21.2 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V21.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback