Acer Predator PO3-620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-620
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 05:48
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 124
2-Core 232
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 591
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780 4GB
Asus(1043 84CA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 50.2
Reflection 55.6
Parallax 64.1
41% 56.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 49.8
47% 59 fps
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 646
Write 265
Mixed 450
100% 454 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 42.6
159% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 339
286% 428 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO3-620 Builds (Compare 2,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO3-620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $726
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback