Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N280 607 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 40.9 1-Core 6.4 2-Core 9.6 16% 19 Pts	4-Core 10.6 8-Core 11 1% 10.8 Pts	64-Core 10.2 1% 10.2 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Intel(8086 2A42) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.3 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.8 1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB 4,724 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 161 171 102 68 93 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.9% Poor	Read 102 Write 188 Mixed 104 SusWrite 121 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 10.5 37% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 10.3 DQ Write 35.7 DQ Mixed 16.5 14% 20.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 MXIC 25L8005 37GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 0, 0, 33 MHz 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	8.37% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.3 6% 2.1 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom N280IntelBench 20%, 607 samples	5x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	4x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 716 samples	1x

SSD
SP600 256GBAdataBench 80%, 4,724 samples	3x
EYOTA-120GB 120GBBench 64%, 48 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 MXIC 25L8005 37GBSamsungBench 8%, 5 samples	4x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Hynix HMT112S6TFR8C-H9 MXIC 25L8005 36GBElpidaBench 7%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16